Eric Draitser of http://StopImperialism.org provides his commentary on the latest statement from President Obama calling for unity in the fight against the Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL/Daesh). Draitser explains that the US and its allies are the principal backers and promoters of international terrorism, and that they use it as a potent weapon in achieving political goals. He notes the rich documented history of collaboration with terrorism up to and including ISIS today.
Despite all the fancy anti-corruption rhetoric, the assault on President Rousseff’s leftist government is the result of a coordinated campaign by business interests tied to Washington and Wall Street.
NEW YORK — (Analysis) The last decade has seen a remarkable coalescing of non-Western nations in both economic and political partnerships. These multilateral institutions have been championed as alternatives to Western organs of political and economic power such as NATO, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank.
From the growth of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization to the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union, China’s “One Belt, One Road” strategy to link much of the Eurasian landmass via trade and investment, and most recently the establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, many have viewed these developments as essential for the decentralization of global power away from the imperial centers of Washington, Wall Street, London and Brussels.
But perhaps none of the emerging Global South international groupings has been more promising in terms of both public relations and real economic partnership than that of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
BRICS countries account for 46 percent of the world’s population – over 3 billion people, as of 2015 – making it the single largest bloc in terms of human capacity among global alliances. The scope of BRICS, combined with its increasing assertiveness as an economic power unto itself, has undoubtedly ruffled a few feathers in Washington and elsewhere in the West.
It should come as no surprise that major moves have been taken in the last 12 to 24 months to undermine each BRICS member nation and destabilize them through political and economic means. And it is no coincidence that those leaders shown smiling and shaking hands at recent BRICS summits are now either the targets of destabilization efforts and subversion – as in the cases of Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa – or are a target of a military and political charm offensive, as in the case of India. In each case, the United States and its allies benefit significantly from the latest developments.
Eric Draitser of StopImperialism.org appears on CPR Sunday with broadcaster Don DeBar to discuss the Empire’s moves to undermine BRICS. Draitser provides detailed analysis of the individuals and groups behind the protest movement in Brazil, noting that powerful right wing, neoliberal forces are bankrolling the movement to remove the democratically elected left wing government of Dilma Rousseff and the Workers’ Party. He also discusses the nature of the protests in South Africa and the powerful players co-opting the movement in the interests of the Empire. Finally, the conversation touches on potential outcomes of this clear offensive by Wall Street and the US establishment, and potential counter-measures by BRICS nations. All this and more in this wide-ranging discussion.
Eric Draitser of StopImperialism.org provides his commentary (March 18, 2016) on the report that the US will work with the International Criminal Court in collecting evidence of ISIS/ISIL genocide. Draitser notes that US promises are disingenuous as Washington has been instrumental in facilitating the rise of the terror group. He notes that the US and ISIS/ISIL have similar goals for the region, and that their geopolitical and strategic objectives coincide nicely. Draitser also adds that US is not a member of the ICC, and that it is yet another example of Washington using international institutions for its own political ends.
Eric Draitser of StopImeprialism.org provides his commentary (March 18, 2016) on the latest developments in the Syrian peace talks. Draitser explains that the potential for peace is there, though it is the reality on the ground which will dictate the terms of any deal and the nature of a “political transition.” He also notes that the Saudi-backed opposition has attempted to dictate terms of negotiation despite coming to the talks from a position of relative weakness.